Red Team Security Services

Talk to an Expert

Solutions

−

Advisory Solutions

Cybersecurity Solutions

Managed Programs

Who We Help

−

Resources

−

Company

−

the trava approach

How Trava Approaches Red Teaming

A penetration test finds exploitable vulnerabilities. A red team engagement answers a harder question: if an attacker found them, would your organization detect it? Trava's practitioners simulate sophisticated, goal-oriented adversaries — moving through your environment the way a real attacker would, using techniques mapped to the MITRE ATT&CK framework, working toward a defined objective, and measuring whether your detection and response capabilities hold up under realistic adversarial pressure.

Detection and response validation is the deliverable

The output isn't a vulnerability list — it's a validated assessment of whether your detection and response capabilities would catch a real attacker at each stage of the attack chain, from initial access through objective execution.

MITRE ATT&CK is the methodology

Every technique is mapped to real-world adversary behavior, giving your team the specific identifiers needed to improve detection rules, tune monitoring, and close the gaps an attacker would exploit. The report translates directly into defensive action.

Scenarios built from your environment

Each engagement starts with reconnaissance specific to your people, processes, and technology. Generic attack chains test generic assumptions. Trava tests yours.

The report tells the full story

A complete narrative of how an attacker moved through your environment from initial access to objective execution, with evidence, timeline, and a clear account of what your defenses caught, what they missed, and what that means.

our methodology

The Five Phases of a Trava Red Team Engagement

Every Trava red team engagement runs through five defined phases — each agreed with your leadership before any activity begins, and each mapped to how a real adversary operates.

Phase 1: Planning and Reconnaissance

Trava works with your leadership to define scope, objectives, and rules of engagement. Reconnaissance gathers open-source intelligence (OSINT) about your people, processes, and technology to design attack paths specific to your environment, not a generic template.

Phase 2: Initial Compromise

Trava attempts to gain a foothold using techniques such as phishing, exploiting exposed services, or leveraging weak credentials. All activities remain within the agreed scope and are carefully monitored throughout.

Phase 3: Exploitation and Lateral Movement

Once inside, Trava tests how far an attacker could progress: escalating privileges, accessing sensitive systems, and moving laterally across the environment while maintaining stealth.

Phase 4: Objective Execution

Trava simulates attacker goals specific to your engagement — exfiltrating sensitive data, compromising business-critical systems, or achieving domain-level control — to demonstrate potential real-world impact with concrete evidence.

Phase 5: Reporting and Debrief

Trava delivers a detailed report covering all attack paths taken, techniques used, business impacts demonstrated, and the effectiveness of your detection and response. An executive debrief translates findings into strategic priorities and a clear path to stronger resilience.

The Two Engagements

Every Trava red team engagement is scoped to one of two approaches, based on your objectives and where you are in your security maturity progression.

Adversary Emulation

Simulates a real-world threat actor across the full attack lifecycle, from initial access through objective execution, using techniques mapped to MITRE ATT&CK. The question isn't whether vulnerabilities exist — it's whether your defenses would detect and stop a determined, goal-oriented attacker.

What You Receive

• Full attack narrative from initial access through objective execution
• Validated assessment of detection and response capability against real-world techniques
• MITRE ATT&CK-mapped findings with identified detection and response gaps
• Prioritized defensive recommendations based on observed control effectiveness

Best Suited For

Organizations with a functioning security program that want to validate whether their defenses hold under real adversarial pressure.

Adversary Emulation — Assumed Breach

Starts from a pre-established internal foothold, simulating post-compromise behavior across lateral movement, privilege escalation, and objective execution — isolating what happens after an attacker is already in.

What You Receive

• Assessment of post-compromise detection and response capability
• Full attack narrative from established foothold to objective execution
• Identification of lateral movement paths, privilege escalation opportunities, and detection gaps
• Prioritized recommendations for improving internal defense and response

Best Suited For

Organizations that have completed external testing and want to focus on post-compromise resilience, or to test the SOC or internal response team under realistic conditions.

Talk to an Expert

FAQ

How does red teaming map to MITRE ATT&CK?

MITRE ATT&CK catalogs the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by real-world threat actors. Trava maps every finding to the corresponding ATT&CK technique, giving your security team a common language to describe what happened, prioritize defensive improvements, and configure detection rules to catch the same techniques in the future. It also makes the report directly actionable for teams who operate a SIEM or work with a managed detection provider.

Do we need penetration testing before red teaming?

For most organizations, yes. Penetration testing identifies and remediates known vulnerabilities; it's the foundation that makes a red team engagement more meaningful. Once foundational vulnerabilities are addressed, a red team engagement measures whether your detection, response, and people-layer defenses hold up against a sophisticated adversary. Trava offers both services and can help assess where your organization is on that maturity curve.

How long does a red team engagement take?

Timelines vary based on scope, environment complexity, and defined objectives, and are confirmed during the Planning and Reconnaissance phase before work begins. Shorter, focused engagements typically run four to six weeks. More complex, full-scope adversary emulations typically run six weeks or more. All timelines and rules of engagement are agreed in advance.

Will my internal security team know the engagement is happening?

That depends on the engagement type. In a blind engagement, only executive leadership is aware; your security team responds as they would to a real attack, which tests detection and response capabilities most accurately. In a disclosed engagement, your security team is informed and can collaborate. Trava recommends blind engagements for organizations whose primary goal is to measure detection and response effectiveness. We'll help you determine the right approach during scoping.

What is the difference between Adversary Emulation and Adversary Emulation — Assumed Breach?

Adversary Emulation covers the full attack lifecycle from the outside in: initial access, lateral movement, privilege escalation, and objective execution. Assumed Breach starts from a pre-established internal foothold, skipping the external attack chain to focus specifically on post-compromise behavior. Assumed Breach is typically the right choice when you've already tested your external surface and want to understand what happens after an attacker is inside, or when your primary goal is to test your SOC or internal response capabilities under realistic conditions.

How Trava Approaches Red Teaming

Detection and response validation is the deliverable

MITRE ATT&CK is the methodology

Scenarios built from your environment

The report tells the full story

The Five Phases of a Trava Red Team Engagement

The Two Engagements

Adversary Emulation

Adversary Emulation — Assumed Breach

Who Red Teaming Is Right For

An untested SOC or MSSP

Years without adversarial validation

Board-level maturity reporting

From documented to tested security

A compliance or board mandate

A high-risk industry

FAQ

How does red teaming map to MITRE ATT&CK?

Do we need penetration testing before red teaming?

How long does a red team engagement take?

Will my internal security team know the engagement is happening?

What is the difference between Adversary Emulation and Adversary Emulation — Assumed Breach?

Your program looks good on paper. A red team tells you how it performs in practice.